- #Pro 42 alignment software portable
- #Pro 42 alignment software software
- #Pro 42 alignment software plus
#Pro 42 alignment software portable
Snap On Pro 42 Visualiner, system complete with stands and turntables.This system was purchased 2 years ago by my shop, has had roughly 1 alignment per week so about 100 alignments since we have owned it.It was purchased directly from our local Snap On rep.According to our local rep this was a demo unit used by Snap On to promote sales to the armed forces and such.When we took delivery of the machine it was obvious it had seen very very light use.Infact most of the documents, and even drawer liners have not been opened.We paid over $16,000 for this unit without stands or turn tables.Blackhawk Industrial lists this with a 24K MSRPUnit is updated to 2016 specs.Runs flawlessly.Has Jacking Compensation and rolling for other racks.The Jacking Compensation is prefered for those who do not have a traditional drive on alignment rack.This system can be used on any 2 post or center post hoist with the stands or on the ground.Very Portable can be used anywhere in the shop.Only reason for sale is we have decided to purchase a drive on alignment style rack to accommodate heavier trucks.I prefer local pickup and will assist in loading or may be able to deliver for a fee.Any questions please feel free to ask.Check my feedback.Cash, Certified Bank Draft/Money Order, Or Credit Cards ok.Paypal is also fine. I have a person that requested a demo on Sunday and promised to hold for him until then.
#Pro 42 alignment software plus
Having these 2 shots you can create a combined photo of your landscape by using well known layers technic plus a little of touch up.Item: 132439836630 Snap On John Bean Visualiner Pro 42 Alignment Machine Portable Stands EEWA559B. One with focus on foreground, another with focus at background. What you need is 2 shots taken one after another. A good tripod costs way less!įor such a kind of "focus stacking" you do not need a special software, alignment, and the rest of photo science. This is especially true when good capture technique is used then $50 Affinity Photo can do the job very well. Given the list of academic citations and their user base, this is overkill for the average photographer. I2K Align is used in medical and academic settings. Look at the warping and displacement that Photoshop automatically applied when attempting it:Īlignment algorithms are intended to handle slight variations in the stack due to minor camera movements, not gross ones like this example.įound i2k Align, but it worth thousand and there's no demo version available. I doubt that any typical stacking tool can do it precisely. The goal was to stack them, not stitch them.Īffinity Photo couldn't align them precisely for me, and neither could Photoshop. I processed both raw images in PhotoLab using my standard preset, then used Affinity to stitch them. I want to make photo stacking from images taken without tripod Yes even me trying manually in photoshop i could not make exact match, too much movement indeed. Please see three images in beginning of this article.
#Pro 42 alignment software software
But why do you need focus stacking software for landscapes? I think you used a panorama, however what i needed is focus stacking, in this case even Affinity does not provide satisfactory alignment. Here are the images if someone wants to try. Sorry, I'm no expert but I can't see any software using auto alignment which could successfully align these two images!! I think you must have significantly shifted your camera position to get such a difference in perspective between the two images. If you manually align one area of the image, it's way out elsewhere in the image and vice versa. I have included a screen grab showing just how far apart the two images are! So in Affinity, I just overlaid both images, one on top of the other and reduced the opacity on one layer to 50%. Then I tried using auto-align with stacking - again very poor result. So I was curious and tried aligning these two images in Affinity Photo using focus merge - very poor result. I've had great results using focus merge in Affinity Photo. When i set Helicon Radius to 50 it does slightly better, but still sides are messed up. In your case, give Affinity a try.Ĭould you try Zerene and Helicon i tried both and result was awful was motion blur on the sides, and ghosting in center, maybe i messed up some setting, was my first time using this. Of the three, I find Affinity to be very good generally, Zerene to produce the best results (my eye yours may vary), and Helicon is somewhere in between while having the most user friendly camera control GUI of the lot. I use Affinity Photo, Helicon Focus and ZereneStacker. You may need to manually adjust the alignment.
0 kommentar(er)
